Tom Mueller wrote:
> I haven't seen any response to this other than from Kshitiz.
>
> Chris, Jennifer, do you think it would be more appropriate to generate
> backup and sync-bundles into the generated directory by default since
> that is where other GlassFish generated files go?
The primary concern I would have about moving the backups directory
under generated is the incompatibility it would create for anyone who
may have scripts to copy the backup zip files to another location. We
have a review at ASarch coming up next week and we can discuss the
potential move there.
Chris
>
> It seems inconsistent to me to look in generated for one type of file
> and then in special purpose directories for the other files.
>
> There are also subdirectories under generated (ejb, jsp, policy,
> xml). Maybe sync and backups should be subdirectories under generated?
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 9/27/2010 11:00 AM, Kshitiz Saxena wrote:
>> I have used /*generated*/ directory as same was used in GlassFish
>> 2.1.1. In many cases, user will provide absolute path specifying the
>> directory where load-balancer xml file need to be created.
>>
>> Since generated directory is used for files generated/exploded by
>> GlassFish, it is best to use the same for load-balancer as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kshitiz
>>
>> On Monday 27 September 2010 07:24 PM, Tom Mueller wrote:
>>> We have several commands that save files on the DAS within the
>>> domain directory tree. Here is a (partial?) list and where the
>>> files are written:
>>>
>>> Command
>>> Output file location
>>> backup-domain <domaindir>/backups
>>> export-http-lb-config
>>> <domaindir>/generated
>>> collect-log-files
>>> no default - --outputfilepath is required param - file is saved on
>>> DAS, param is absolute pathname, no option to save locally (--retrieve)
>>> export-sync-bundle
>>> <domaindir>/sync
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm just checking to make sure this is ok when looking at this
>>> across all of the commands.
>>>
>>> backup-domain and export-sync-bundle are creating their own
>>> directory for this, while export-http-lb-config is reusing a
>>> directory that is already there. Should the former commands use the
>>> generated directory too? Should export-http-lb-config create its
>>> own directory? Should collect-log-files have a default place within
>>> the domain tree to put the files?
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>> Tom
>>>