On 4/30/10 1:04 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
> Vijay Ramachandran wrote on 04/30/10 12:11 PM:
>> We are not assuming that the server is going to be up and that the
>> communication is reliable. We will try to send the command to the
>> instance and get back results. If sending the command itself failed, we
>> will flag it as one type of error that indicates something wrong with
>> network or the server. If the command went through to the server but the
>> command execution fails, we will get a detailed error (just as it
>> happens now between CLI-DAS), and we will display this error. In either
>> of the failure cases, we indicate to the caller (the CLI or GUI), that
>> the server(s) where the replication failed need to be restarted.
>
> And the *user* is responsible for restarting the server, correct?
As of now, yes - that is the plan.
Vijay