At last weeks meeting there was a suggestion to do the initial
synchronization in the asadmin command (i.e. just before starting the
instance's JVM), because the infrastructure was already there.
I suppose that's were this question comes from?
Why was "java -jar glassfish.jar" supported in the first place? Simpler
start-up? Or to show-case embedded?
I'd think those use-cases are not relevant for an instance in a cluster,
so exclusively through asadmin should be fine?
On 18/03/2010 07:32, Byron Nevins wrote:
> Question: Should we support starting server-instances via "java -jar
> glassfish.jar"? Or exclusively through an asadmin command?
>
>