admin@glassfish.java.net

Re: [Issue 10743] [admin_gui] OLH TOC not deep enough

From: Kim Haase <Camilla.Haase_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:07:04 -0500

On 11/04/09 14:47, Ken Paulsen wrote:
>
> Hi Kim,
>
> I don't think I fully understand what is being asked here. Can you give
> a comparison of before/after your proposed change?

Our genhtml command has a limit of 4 levels of TOC. So right now all we
see is (for example)

Enterprise Server Administration Console Reference
   Resources
     JDBC
       Connection Pools
       JDBC
       JDBC Resources

There are several topics under Connection Pools and JDBC Resources, but
they aren't visible. To make them visible I have to put all of them
directly under JDBC. In the TOC, once alphabetized, they would look like
this.

Enterprise Server Administration Console Reference
   Resources
     JDBC
       Connection Pools
       Edit Connection Pool
       Edit Connection Pool Advanced Attributes
       Edit Connection Pool Properties
       Edit JDBC Resource
       JDBC
       JDBC Resources
       New JDBC Connection Pool (Step 1 of 2)
       New JDBC Connection Pool (Step 2 of 2)
       New JDBC Resource
       Properties Specific to JDBC Connection Pools

Kim

>
> Thanks!
>
> Ken
>
> chaase3_at_dev.java.net wrote:
>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10743
>>
>>
>>
>> User chaase3 changed the following:
>>
>> What |Old value |New value
>> ================================================================================
>>
>> CC|'pauldavies'
>> |'anilam,kenpaulsen,pauldav
>> | |ies'
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Additional comments from chaase3_at_dev.java.net Wed Nov 4
>> 19:32:00 +0000 2009 -------
>> In order to make deeper subtopics visible I'm going to have to flatten
>> the
>> organization of the OLH for reference topics so that, for example, all
>> the JMS
>> resources topics, or all the Network Config topics, appear on the same
>> level.
>>
>> Allowing deeper nesting is a tools issue that can't be fixed right away.
>>
>> Is that going to be a problem, Ken?
>>