Sreenivas Munnangi wrote on 9/24/09 1:55 PM:
> Bill Shannon wrote:
>> Prashanth Abbagani wrote on 9/23/09 11:20 PM:
>>
>>> Sreenivas Munnangi wrote:
>>>
>>>> For enable-monitoring, pl. change --level to --modules based on Bill's
>>>> comment.
>>>>
>>>> *In that case, changing "enable-monitoring --level mod1:HIGH,mod2:LOW"
>>>> to "enable-monitoring --modules mod1,mod2:LOW" would be better.
>>>> *
>>>>
>>> I have to mod3 to HIGH along with mod1 and mod2 to LOW. How do I do that?
>>>
>>
>> enable-monitoring --modules mod1:LOW,mod2:LOW,mod3:HIGH
>> or
>> enable-monitoring --modules mod1:LOW,mod2:LOW,mod3
>>
>>
>>> Why not use the same style as --property name=value[:name=value]* ?
>>> I believe you are trying to reduce the typing, but it can be confusing
>>> to the user.
>>>
>>
>> If most of the time most people are going to set monitoring to HIGH,
>> it's much simpler:
>>
>> enable-monitoring --modules mod1,mod2,mod3
>>
>> You can decide whether you want commas and colons,
>> or colons and equals:
>>
>> enable-monitoring --modules mod1=LOW:mod2=LOW:mod3
>>
> Similar to disable-monitoring, following would be ideal
>
> enable-monitoring --modules mod1=HIGH,mod2,mod3=LOW // notice the use of
> comma instead of colon
The above sets mod1 and mod 2 to HIGH, right?
> Prashanth suggested that we can have 'all' option to set the level for
> all modules at once without specifying each, for ex.
>
> enable-monitoring --modules all=LOW // this will set level to 'LOW' for
> all modules
>
> enable-monitoring --modules all // this will set level to 'HIGH' for all
> modules
Shouldn't the latter be the default?