Vivek Pandey wrote:
> Whats the configuration command for the web container or ejb container?
> Are they called configure-web-container or configure-ejb-container?
No, we don't have such high level commands for ejb/web containers.
They are mostly handled via dotted names.
> If
> not then what is the guidelines for naming container configuration?
I think what Paul has suggested (configure-jruby-container) is reasonable
and you may consider following that if that's what you think too.
Paul -- I have renamed setup-ldap-for-admin to configure-ldap-for-admin.
-Kedar
>
> -vivek.
>
>
> Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>> Like I said, I applaud the efforts. Maybe we should put this in
>> pluggability guide that discusses something like -- How to extend
>> GlassFish administration commands.
>>
>> BTW, those suggestions should be enhanced to provide more verbs where
>> we standardize on certain English language verbs, especially those
>> that describe "composite" tasks, of which configure-ldap-for-admin is an
>> example.
>>
>> Maybe we should do a tool to warn the module developers about
>> potential violations of the conventions?
>>
>> I guess the ship has sailed for already released commands, but maybe
>> for commands not in Prelude and in FCS should keep this in mind.
>>
>> -Kedar
>>
>> Paul Davies wrote:
>>> Hi Kedar,
>>>
>>> As these commands are being developed under the auspices of the
>>> GlassFish project, would it not be possible to contact the module
>>> owners, who must be known to us, to suggest that the command names be
>>> consistent?
>>>
>>> I realize that we do not have control over arbitrary 3rd-party
>>> modules, but we do provide guidelines
>>> <http://docs.sun.com/doc/820-7727/ghrpm> to ensure consistency. In
>>> the interest of setting a good example to contributors to the
>>> GlassFish project and owners of arbitrary 3rd-party modules, should
>>> we try to follow our own conventions?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/07/09 15:21, Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>>>> I appreciate your efforts, but in a modular server, that's going to
>>>> result -- the inconsistency in command names because we don't have
>>>> control over how modules write/name their commands.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but we should do the best practices for naming.
>>>>
>>>> Paul Davies wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> While looking at the new asadmin commands in build 58, I noticed a
>>>>> couple of commands the names of which appear not to follow the
>>>>> established conventions for asadmin command names:
>>>>>
>>>>> * jruby-container-config
>>>>> * setup-ldap-for-admin
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I was wondering if, for the sake of consistency and ease of use,
>>>>> the names these commands should be change. If so, I would suggest
>>>>> the following names:
>>>>>
>>>>> * configure-jruby-container
>>>>> * configure-ldap-for-admin
>>>>
>>>> I wrote this new command which I am going to document extensively
>>>> and yes,
>>>> I can rename it per your suggestion. As my commit log says, this
>>>> command
>>>> is still experimental, very close to being inducted in the hall of
>>>> fame ;)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -Kedar
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Paul Davies, Senior Technical Writer, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.sun.com/techscribe/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: admin-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: admin-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paul Davies, Senior Technical Writer, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>>> http://blogs.sun.com/techscribe/
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: admin-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: admin-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>