admin@glassfish.java.net

Re: Comments on grizzly config one pager

From: Kedar Mhaswade <Kedar.Mhaswade_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:18:32 -0800

Tim Quinn wrote:
> Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>>
>>
>> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>> I would like to see the DTD for overall domain.xml validation more
>>> than field validation which as you mention will be preferably handled
>>> by the beans validation framework.
>>
>> For a schema validation kind of requirement, yes, I agree, DTD will
>> come in handy.
> Is there a reason to prefer a DTD to an XSD, if someone actually starts
> on this work?

I don't think there is any preference as such.
I think DTD is more inline with previous releases and I am personally
more familiar with them and as such I am likely to find things faster
with a DTD. But that's just me.

BTW, do you know if someone is working on it? I was planning to start
working on it. Do you know if there is someone else?

-Kedar

>
> - Tim
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: admin-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: admin-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>