On Apr 8, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>> Shouldn't we use the Bean Validation spec (JSR-303) to do this?
>> last time I checked, there was no binary availability, but in the
>> future, yes that seems like a good fit
>
> I guess that's my way of saying.... If we're going to use Bean
> Validation
> in the future, maybe we shouldn't waste too much time building some
> stopgap
> solution now.
the solution we need is a fragment is what this jsr would offer. I am
all for using stuff available today but going through an RI
implementation of any jsr is rapidly costly.
>
>
> Or even better, perhaps we can start an implementation of Bean
> Validation
> and use this use case to make sure the spec is reasonable?
I really don't think we have the cycles for that but if byron feels
like it, that would be fine with me.
jerome
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: admin-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: admin-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>