admin@glassfish.java.net

Re: defect in collection handling code

From: Lloyd L Chambers <Lloyd.Chambers_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:37:03 -0700

Jerome,

Maybe, maybe not.

It's hard for me to keep having to deal with details like this (not
the only one) while trying to make AMX work for the GUI.

Lloyd

On Apr 22, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Jerome Dochez wrote:

> Lloyd L Chambers wrote:
>> Jerome,
>>
>> The Config code allows the following to occur:
>>
>> <jvm-options>-Dfoo=bar</jvm-options>
>> <jvm-options>-Dfoo=bar</jvm-options>
>> <jvm-options>-Dfoo=bar</jvm-options>
>> <jvm-options>-Dfoo=bar</jvm-options>
>> <jvm-options>-Dfoo=bar</jvm-options>
>> <jvm-options>-Dfoo=bar</jvm-options>
>>
>> I can't see any reason to allow this for <jvm-options>, though
>> maybe there is a reason for other cases.
>>
>> Thoughts? Should support for Set<String> be added to indicate
>> uniqueness?
>>
>> What should AMX do about this?
> let's revisit this after TP-2, I don't think we need to solve it now.
>
> jerome
>
>>
>> Lloyd
>>
>> ---
>> Lloyd L Chambers
>> lloyd.chambers_at_sun.com
>> Sun Microsystems, Inc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

---
Lloyd L Chambers
lloyd.chambers_at_sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc