admin@glassfish.java.net

Re: follow up on last Friday's SAF/AMF discussions

From: Sreenivas Munnangi <Sreenivas.Munnangi_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:00:34 -0700

Hong Zhang wrote:
> I've followed up with Binod and confirmed that AMF does not need to
> manage standalone appclient module. :-) Nandini, so please update the
> one-pager by removing the requirement on appclient under jsr77
> implementation section.
>
> It seems the AMF does need to manage the resource adapter module, so
> that item will remain on the list.
I had sent an email to Binod explaining the jsr77 role in handling
resource modules.
>
> I also did some investigation on why the JSR77 start did not load the
> previously deployed (with disabled state) ear application during
> server start up. It seems in the enable path we have a few places
> checking for "enable" attribute before actually loading the
> application, and the "enabled=false" prevent the application from
> being loaded. So we might have to loosen the checks in those places
> for this to happen.
I think we still need to honor the value for enable attribute, for ex.
if it is false then the app. should not be loaded. We need to make sure
that the jsr77 start/stop works fine.
> - Hong
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: admin-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: admin-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>