admin@glassfish.java.net

Re: AS 9.1 P1,P2,P3 Documentation Bugs

From: Paul Davies <Paul-Martin.Davies_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:37:49 -0700

Judy Tang wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> It sound reasonable. Do please keep the following into the consideration.
>
> (1) Please help us to communicate to the doc team to try to fix those
> bugs we
> have opened by beta 3 HCF. SQE will only have time to do onc cycle of
> review, so it is more efficient to have all the bugs fixed, then SQE
> starts the
> review. That is the reason I send out the list of bugs to follow up.

Perhaps it would makes sense for me to discuss with the doc group the process
for fixing bugs and to document the process. I am thinking that any bug fixes
should be initially reviewed by the submitter and the engineering SME before the
fix is delivered to SQE for verification. Does that sound reasonable?
>
> (2) SQE needs at least 1 week time to finish the review. With your plan to
> have SQE start the review after beta 3 HCF, then bugs we open will
> most likely to get fixed in AS 9.1 FCS, right ?

Yes, that's what I was thinking.

Regards,
-- 
Paul Davies, Senior Technical Writer, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
http://blogs.sun.com/techscribe/