Hi Andrew,
>I've been experimenting using genericjmsra with Spring and Jenks JCA container
>with TIB EMS but have stumbled across a problem (I believe) unrelated to Spring.
>
>I'd like to use dynamic, named queues, without JNDI. Creating an
>ActivationSpec
>equivalent of
> QueueSession.createQueue("my.queue.name");
>
>To do this I've created an ActivationSpec with properties:
> destinationType = javax.jms.Queue
> destinationProperties = "QueueName=my.queue.name"
>
>But from reading the genericjmsra source and the TIB EMS doc - I'm not
>sure thats possible. The queue name property on TibjmsQueue implementation
>isn't settable and the only way this would be possible is if the
>constructor takes
>the Queue name as an argument.
>
>
AFAIK, you are right. The problem is what you described only. TIBCO's
jms libray does
not have setter methods as per javabean standards. Please open a case
using, so that this
gets addressed in genericra:-
https://genericjmsra.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectIssues.
However JNDI mode should work. Infact, JNDI mode is provided exactly for
provders who provide
these kind of jms libraries. Is there a reason, why that mode wont suit you?
>Are dynamic, named queues not supported (or for that matter temporary queues)?
>
>
Temperory queues will work. There is no reason, why it should not.
- Binod.
>Any help appreciated.
>Andrew
>
>javax.resource.ResourceException: Invalid destination
> at com.sun.genericra.util.ExceptionUtils.newResourceException(ExceptionUtils.java:68)
> at com.sun.genericra.inbound.EndpointConsumer._start(EndpointConsumer.java:153)
> at com.sun.genericra.inbound.EndpointConsumer.start(EndpointConsumer.java:113)
> at com.sun.genericra.GenericJMSRA.endpointActivation(GenericJMSRA.java:97)
>
>
>
>