On Jan 19, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Mark Swanson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Before I tested the nice time/space FI compression I wanted to make
> sure that normal non-FI clients would still perform well. In
> summary I found that the FI stax implementation for non-FI clients
> was about 1.85x slower than woodstox and about 1.4x slower than the
> RI.
What do you mean by "FI stax implementation for non-FI clients"?
The FI stax parser can only parse FI, so you must be using some other
parser if the input is XML.
You may also want to take a look at Japex (https://
japex.dev.java.net) where you can find drivers in the JDSL (Japex
drivers standard library) and run performance tests for several of
the mainstream XML parsers --I don't think we have one for Woodstox,
but it should be easy to write by copying one of the others.
-- Santiago