I know you are kidding but...
IANAL, but I'm pretty sure javaxx.* would be problematic. Where the
boundary lies is unclear to me... but as Sun employees we try to stay
clearly on the safe side so we can't be accused of asking others to
follow rules what we do not follow ourselves...
- edaurd/o
Santiago Pericas-Geertsen wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I missed the mail where this proposal first came up.
>>
>> We cannot use anything in the javax.* or java.* namespaces unless it
>> is part of a JCP-approved process.
>
>
> How about javaxx.* ? :-) Just kidding, thanks for the clarification.
>
> -- Santiago