+1
Would @MaxPoolSize also limit the amount of active SFSBS?
Carlo
On 01/18/2016 04:33 PM, Abhishek Gupta wrote:
> Definitely +1. Good to see some EJB related discussions :-)
>
> The above mentioned annotations would help
>
> 1. Tune EJBs in a standard manner
> 2. Sending across a clear message w.r.t one of the most important EJB
> features e.g. @Stateless does not really say that you also have
> throtlling & pooling capabilities (one needs to mention it explicitly)
>
> I also suggest including another annotation:
> /_at_javax.ejb.InitialPoolSize/. This will aid in eager initialisation
> (just like Singleton EJBs) and ensure having enough firepower 'in the
> tank' to begin with
>
> Thanks
> Abhishek
>
> Thanks
>
> Abhishek
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Latest (mini) book <https://leanpub.com/ejb-annotations-primer> ! |
> Java Caching Refcard <https://dzone.com/refcardz/java-caching>| Java
> EE Blog <https://abhirockzz.wordpress.com/>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:36 PM, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Pool settings as well as an @TransactionTimeout would be quite
> handy indeed.
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:58 AM, <johan_at_lodgon.com
> <mailto:johan_at_lodgon.com>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> This really can save lots of boilerplate code in projects.
>
>
>