Thanks Florent.
Experts,
Should we tighten the spec so that it does not give a wrong impression
that there is an option for an embeddable container to have more than
one instance in the same VM at the same time?
Please reply "yes" to tighten
"no" to keep it as-is.
thanks,
-marina
On 3/10/13 12:41 AM, Florent BENOIT wrote:
> sequentially
>
> Florent
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Marina Vatkina
> <marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com <mailto:marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Florent,
>
> Concurrently or sequentially?
>
> thanks,
> -marina
>
>
> On 3/8/13 1:09 AM, Florent BENOIT wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We support more than one container in the same VM
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Marina Vatkina
>> <marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com <mailto:marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Experts,
>>
>> The EJB spec (see 18.2.4Embeddable Container Shutdown) says
>> the following:
>>
>> "An embeddable Container Provider is only required to support
>> one active embeddable EJB container at a time per JVM.
>> Attempts to concurrently create multiple active embeddable
>> EJB containers may result in a container initialization error."
>>
>> The RI allows to create containers only sequentially.
>>
>> Question for those of you who *produce* embeddable EJB
>> containers: do you *support* more than one container in the
>> same VM?
>>
>> Question for those of you who *use* embeddable EJB
>> containers: do you *use* more than one container in the same VM?
>>
>> thanks,
>> -marina
>>
>>
>
>