PS: please note that this does _not_ require to change any code or apply @javax.inject.Scope. This would purely be a textual clarification in the spec.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Struberg <struberg_at_yahoo.de>
> To: ejb-users <users_at_ejb-spec.java.net>
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 6:02 PM
> Subject: [ejb-spec users] Question regarding CDI Scope for @Stateless beans
>
> Dear EJB EG!
>
> We have a question regarding the scope which we should use for @Stateless beans
> handling in CDI. Currently this is defined as being treated as @Dependent. But
> this is obviously wrong and got only worded that way to prevent the CDI
> containers from applying CDI NormalScoped proxies.
>
>
> Please see the discussion so far on our CDI EG issue tracker:
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-278
>
> A possible solution would be to define javax.ejb.Stateless as non-normalscoped
> CDI scope. CDI would *not* apply any client proxies itself that way but we would
> be able to return javax.ejb.Stateless.class in Bean#getScope() for EJBs.
>
> We think this is a good solution but don't like to define this in the CDI
> spec because this is clearly an EJB related question and we don't like to
> cross-specify EJB behaviour in the CDI spec.
>
> Wdyt? Would that fit into your concept?
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>