Hi Marina,
So I just want to confirm then. Is it your belief that the portable JNDI
locations should be used for both local and remote lookups, based on the
current spec (EJB 3.1)?
Thanks,
John
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Marina Vatkina
<marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>wrote:
> John,
>
> The standard JNDI names are the same for remote and local invocations. If
> you are asking about names that include host and port of the target server,
> it's probably a no-go as the interop (and even remote client) are targeted
> for becoming optional in the future Java EE version(s).
>
> Best,
> -marina
>
>
> John D. Ament wrote:
>
>> Experts,
>>
>> A question was raised recently regarding Remote JNDI locations.
>> Currently, the specs define standardized local JNDI names. There is no
>> guarantee that the remote names would be the same. Is it possible to come
>> up with standardized naming conventions for remote EJBs (session beans)
>> that can be looked up in a consistent manner across application servers?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> John
>>
>