A better example might've helped, but it can be too late now: the JCA
spec is finishing the MR updates this week, and the JCA spec lead felt
that it's a too big of a change for an MR update.
-marina
On 2/4/13 2:19 PM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
> +1
>
> Talked it over with David. This is all about a more flexible way to
> specify the contract between MDB and RA. The "prompt" and "port" bits
> are just bad examples of usage and I think David will fix those up in
> his example.
>
> So at the end of the day it would just mean that the result of
> MessageEndpointFactory#createEndpoint would be an object exposing the
> same method as a no-interface view. While the bean class itself
> optionally gets set on the activation spec.
>
> I'm all in favor to get this in.
>
> Carlo
>
> On 02/04/2013 10:49 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>> Noticed the related JIRA (http://java.net/jira/browse/EJB_SPEC-60)
>> was marked as "Future version"
>>
>> Would be really great if we could get this in. There's been great
>> support for it in the EJB over the last year and it is our 3rd most
>> popular issue:
>>
>> http://java.net/jira/browse/EJB_SPEC#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Apopularissues-panel
>>
>> Given all the work we put in and that there will be a Connector 1.7
>> after all and how small of a change it is with a big upside, I really
>> hope we can get it in.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>