That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
-Jeremy
From: Marina Vatkina <marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>
To: jsr345-experts_at_ejb-spec.java.net,
Date: 02/06/2013 12:28 PM
Subject: [jsr345-experts] Re: [ejb-spec users] Re: Re: Interceptors
spec 1.2 draft is available for review
Hi Jeremy,
Priority annotation itself is part of the common annotations spec. So it
was kept very generic.
thanks,
-marina
On 2/6/13 8:49 AM, Jeremy Bauer wrote:
Hi Marina,
One minor comment/question. Rather than using integer-based priority
ranges, did you consider using strict priority types and weight? For
example, @Priority(type=APPLICATION, weight=10). An integral value with
proposed ranges is simpler and very flexible, but using a specific type
would make the intent of the interceptor/interception point more concrete.
-Jeremy
From: Jeremy Bauer/Rochester/IBM_at_IBMUS
To: marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com,
Cc: jsr345-experts_at_ejb-spec.java.net
Date: 02/04/2013 10:18 AM
Subject: [ejb-spec users] [jsr345-experts] Re: Re: Interceptors
spec 1.2 draft is available for review
Thanks, Marina.
It certainly was a lot of work, which is even more evident from the diff!
Thank you for posting. It is helpful. I'll post comments soon.
-Jeremy
From: Marina Vatkina <marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>
To: jsr345-experts_at_ejb-spec.java.net,
Date: 02/01/2013 08:31 PM
Subject: [ejb-spec users] [jsr345-experts] Re: Interceptors spec
1.2 draft is available for review
I uploaded the file with diffs if it's of any help:
http://java.net/projects/interceptors-spec/downloads/download/interceptor-1-2-dr1-diff.pdf
-marina
On 2/1/13 1:31 PM, Marina Vatkina wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
It was a lot of work ;). I can create a diff from the original+ (i.e. the
version that Linda created in the framemaker from 1.1), but it will also
show a lot of changes, not the changes for a specific sentence.
-marina
On 2/1/13 1:16 PM, Jeremy Bauer wrote:
Hi Marina,
The change bars cover nearly the entire document, making it difficult to
target the updated sections. If possible, can you provide a document with
more accurate change bars?
-Jeremy
From: Marina Vatkina <marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>
To: jsr345-experts_at_ejb-spec.java.net, Pete Muir <pmuir_at_redhat.com>,
Date: 01/29/2013 04:07 PM
Subject: [jsr345-experts] Interceptors spec 1.2 draft is available
for review
After a lot of work by Linda, me, and Pete, we have the Interceptors
spec 1.2 draft for review:
http://java.net/projects/interceptors-spec/downloads/download/interceptor-1-2-dr1.pdf
What's there:
Editorial cleanup and conversion to standard template.
Assigned chapter numbers to sections and rearranged various sections and
examples for better flow.
Clarified statement regarding transaction context of lifecycle callback
methods
Added a note on a timeout method that is also a business method and
around-timeout and around-invoke interceptors
Added Chapter 1 (Overview)
Added Chapter 3, derived from Chapter 9 of the CDI specification.
Removed deployment descriptors definitions (general notes about
possibility of DDs are there)
Added examples with interceptor bindings to common sections.
Added standard Priority ranges
What's not there:
@AroundConstruct interceptor
Notes on "throws Exception" clauses in the around-xxx method signatures
Perfect CDI alignment - the text (and fonts) might be not fully aligned.
Please review ASAP.
Pete, please forward to the CDI EG.
thanks,
-marina