Hi,
At least the first one seems relevant to me.
We already have references to JAX-RPC (ok I know, too old but it's still
there) and on JAW-WS, so why not adding more cross spec references?
Jean-Louis
2013/1/12 Marina Vatkina <marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>
> Experts,
>
> Java API for Web Socket (http://java.net/projects/**
> websocket-spec/downloads/**directory/Spec%20javadoc%**
> 20Drafts/v011%20-%20Public%**20Draft<http://java.net/projects/websocket-spec/downloads/directory/Spec%20javadoc%20Drafts/v011%20-%20Public%20Draft>)
> lists SFSB as an option for the websocket endpoint. SFSB is indeed the best
> match between various session bean types for the websocket endpoint as it
> maps nicely into the endpoint lifecycle, with singleton being the next best
> thing (using Lock(READ) to allow for truly concurrent conversations), and
> SLSBs being distant third (for the cases where concurrency is more
> important than carrying the state between the calls).
>
> This is the brief description from the Web Socket spec lead, Danny Coward,
> on the subject:
>
> "We would very much like to allow web socket developers to write websocket
> endpoints using EJBs. We have identified that it makes sense to allow
> websocket developers to use either stateless or stateful session beans as
> well as singletons. There is a particularly good match for stateful session
> beans with the typical websocket use cases."
>
>
> Currently EJB spec doesn't say anything about EJBs being used by JAX-RS
> (nor the Web Socket), the correspceptorsonding specs do (but while they do
> so, they do not cover e.g. if and how the interceptors are executed on the
> bean methods, and what constitutes the client view of such bean).
>
> Do you think that EJB spec should:
> a) just acknowledge such use cases, and include Web Socket in this
> acknowledgement
> b) describe in details the client view, interceptors, etc., similar to the
> web services endpoint descriptions
> c) continue to be mum about those use cases
>
> thanks,
> -marina
>
> P.S. The second part of this discussion is about SFSB lifecycle (in
> particular destruction rules) and will continue on the thread "enabling
> bean-level retainIfException?" (http://java.net/projects/ejb-**
> spec/lists/jsr345-experts/**archive/2012-12/message/16<http://java.net/projects/ejb-spec/lists/jsr345-experts/archive/2012-12/message/16>).
>
>
>
--
Jean-Louis