jsr345-experts@ejb-spec.java.net

[jsr345-experts] [Fwd: [JIRA] Created: (EJB_SPEC-70) Inconsistencies in descriptions of exceptions from different interceptor types]

From: Marina Vatkina <marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:27:15 -0800

Let me know if you see a problem with having the same rules in all 3 (LC
interceptor will say "if executed in a transactional context" for the
rollback rule).

thanks,
-marina

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [JIRA] Created: (EJB_SPEC-70) Inconsistencies in descriptions
of exceptions from different interceptor types
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:51:49 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
From: marina vatkina (JIRA) <jira-no-reply_at_java.net>
To: mvatkina_at_java.net



Inconsistencies in descriptions of exceptions from different interceptor types
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: EJB_SPEC-70
                 URL: http://java.net/jira/browse/EJB_SPEC-70
             Project: ejb-spec
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 3.2
            Reporter: marina vatkina
            Assignee: marina vatkina
             Fix For: 3.2


7.3.1 Exceptions covers rollback and no preDestroy calls
7.4.1 Exceptions only says that AroundTimeout methods may throw system exceptions, but not application exceptions.
7.5.1 Exceptions doesn't mention a possibility of marking transaction for rollback


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://java.net/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira