Antonio Goncalves wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the new Bean Validation 1.1 method-level validation I expect
> something to work out of the box (with or without CDI) :
>
> @Stateless
> public class AccountService {
>
> public Account get(*_at_NotNull* Account model) { }
> }
>
>
> As for Stateful bean the question is "is there a possible integration
> between BV and EJB like JPA or JSF" ? For example, in the following
> code, shall we automatically validate the bean on @Remove (like
> @PreRemove on JPA) :
@Remove is probably not very useful. How about post-PostConstruct (on
any bean type)?
-marina
>
> @Stateful
> public class ShoppingCart {
>
> *_at_NotNull*
> private List<CartItem> cartItems;
>
> *_at_Remove*
> public voide checkout { // validate cartItems ? }
> }
>
> I don't really see the point in something like that, but I might miss
> something. Could there be another possible integration ?
>
> Antonio
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Marina Vatkina
> <marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com <mailto:marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Experts,
>
> As you know, EJB spec currently doesn't support Bean Validation.
> Do we want to change that?
>
> Let me know if you think that:
>
> a) BV should be supported for EJBs without CDI being enabled
> (probably with an opt-in flag to be backward compatible)
> b) BV should be supported for EJBs only if CDI is enabled
> c) there is no need for standardizing BV with respect to EJBs
> d) you don't care either way :(
>
>
> thanks,
> -marina
>
>
>
>
> --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG
> <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>