In a perfect world I would totally agree with you (with the exception of
the filed RFEs in the JIRA, that were by their nature intended as a
general wish list). I would also prefer that each and every EG member
expresses an opinion on each and every issue being discussed. As you
know this doesn't happen either.
Regarding the timelines - (unfortunately) people go on vacations or can
be swamped with the project deadlines. So unless everybody feels that
this is what we should do, I will not be imposing any restrictions
beyond those defined on our schedule for delivering this specification
(and the time I need to write anything up to meet those deadlines).
That said, if you think that an item didn't get a closure, feel free to
resend the proposal to the group and ask for a deadline on a resolution.
thanks,
-marina
Carlo de Wolf wrote:
> Just a thought: would it not make more sense to have each proposal
> weighed against the opinions stated within a defined period (for
> example 2 weeks), instead of shelving proposals which have no opinions?
>
> It would make the process more progressive instead of conservative.
>
> Carlo