jsr345-experts@ejb-spec.java.net

[jsr345-experts] Re: [ejb-spec users] EJB/MDB improvements described in EJB_SPEC-43

From: Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf_at_redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:51:06 +0200

+1 on 1)

I would rather not tie MDB's more to JMS.
To me it would make more sense if we had a facility that allowed
propagation of metadata into the RAR via other means.

@MessageDriven
@ConnectionFactoryJndiName("foo")
public class MyMDB { }

<message-driven>
<jms:connection-factory-jndi-name>foo</jms:connection-factory-jndi-name>
</message-driven>

That way any type of inflow can benefit from this proposal.

Carlo

On 04/17/2012 12:41 AM, Marina Vatkina wrote:
> Experts,
>
> JMS 2.0 EG proposed chages to MDBs described in EJB_SPEC-43. Please
> read (if you hadn't done so) the proposed chages and vote on the
> following options at the bottom of the description:
>
> 1) New mandatory activation property connectionFactoryJndiName
> 2) New element <connection-factory-jndi-name> and corresponding
> annotation @MessageDriven(connectionFactoryJndiName=...
> 3) Both 1) and 2)
> 4) Neither
>
> thanks,
> -marina