+1
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 08:30, Stefan Heldt <stefan.heldt_at_holisticon.de>wrote:
> +1
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Reza Rahman [mailto:reza_rahman_at_lycos.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2011 17:12
> An: jsr345-experts_at_ejb-spec.java.net
> Betreff: [jsr345-experts] Re: XXX under section 4.3.10
>
> +1
>
> On 9/7/2011 7:36 AM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
> > I would say: yes.
> >
> > Carlo
> >
> > On 09/07/2011 03:53 AM, Marina Vatkina wrote:
> >> Experts,
> >>
> >> Please advise on the following clarification request marked as XXX
> >> under section 4.3.10 Stateful Session Bean Removal
> >>
> >> Q If there are multiple remove methods, can their retainIfException
> >> values differ? (I would assume so):
> >>
> >>
> >> "If the Remove annotation specifies the value of retainIfException as
> >> true and the invocation of the Remove method throws an application
> >> exception, the instance is not removed. The retain-if-exception
> >> subelement of the remove-method deployment descriptor element may be
> >> explicitly specified to override the retainIfException value
> >> specified or defaulted by the Remove annotation. The default value of
> >> the retainIfException element is false."
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> -marina
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3881 - Release Date:
> > 09/06/11
> >
> >
>
>
--
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion
Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> |
Twitter<http://twitter.com/agoncal>|
Blog <http://feeds.feedburner.com/AntonioGoncalves> |
LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>| Paris
JUG <http://www.parisjug.org>