On 25 Sep 2011, at 19:36, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
> Coming back to this topic, I'd like to ask a question to Pete (as I'm not part of CDI 1.1 EG). Is the EG thinking/talking about reliable event handling (eg. will the event be stored if the node goes down and then fired as soon as the node goes up) ? Because that's one strenght JMS has and that's the API to use if you want realiable messages. So the CDI 1.1 (or 1.x) is thinking about that, that could bring CDI and JMS closer and closer.
No it's not. We would prefer to offer integration between the CDI eventing system and JMS to provide such capabilities. I think the JMS 2.0 EG has proposed this.