I actually like when the spec is as exhaustive as it can. I would go for
option a) to make it even clearer.
My 2 cents
Antonio
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:35, Marina Vatkina <marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com>wrote:
> Does anybody have a preference? If not, I'll go with option b).
>
> -marina
>
>
> Marina Vatkina wrote:
>
>> Experts,
>>
>> Table 19 (Required contents of EJB 3.2 Lite and Full EJB 3.2 API) doesn't
>> lists 2.x Local Home/Component interfaces, which causes some confusion.
>>
>> I assume it's just a typo. To fix it, I can
>> a) add a row or
>> b) remove word "Remote" from the "2.x Remote Home/Component" row
>>
>> Please let me know your preferences.
>>
>> thanks,
>> -marina
>>
>
--
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion
Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> |
Twitter<http://twitter.com/agoncal>|
Blog <http://feeds.feedburner.com/AntonioGoncalves> |
LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>| Paris
JUG <http://www.parisjug.org>