jsr345-experts@ejb-spec.java.net
[jsr345-experts] Re: Question about (EJB_SPEC-20) Application Exceptions as part of a throws clause
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Marina Vatkina <
marina.vatkina_at_oracle.com
>
Date
: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:14:26 -0700
Stefan,
Here is another (similar) case of a "may be defined":
"Lifecycle callback interceptor methods may be defined directly on the
bean class or on a separate interceptor class
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Marina Vatkina: "[jsr345-experts] Re: Question about (EJB_SPEC-20) Application Exceptions as part of a throws clause"
Previous message
:
Reza Rahman: "[jsr345-experts] Re: Question about (EJB_SPEC-20) Application Exceptions as part of a throws clause"
In reply to
:
Stefan Heldt: "[jsr345-experts] Re: Question about (EJB_SPEC-20) Application Exceptions as part of a throws clause"
Next in thread
:
Marina Vatkina: "[jsr345-experts] Re: Question about (EJB_SPEC-20) Application Exceptions as part of a throws clause"
Reply
:
Marina Vatkina: "[jsr345-experts] Re: Question about (EJB_SPEC-20) Application Exceptions as part of a throws clause"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]