Personally, I think @Asynchronous is fine (in fact, I think it is
probably more intuitive than the proposed syntax). The cases are very
rare that a synchronous method would suddenly be used asynchronously
without the bean developer's knowledge. It's also the case that in order
to support things like cancellation, the bean would have to be aware
that it is being invoked asynchronously.
Cheers,
Reza
On 6/30/2011 1:57 PM, Marina Vatkina wrote:
> Thanks for asking. The official guideline is to use this list :)
>
> -marina
>
> Pete Muir wrote:
>> Where should we discuss this - comments thread? email list?
>>
>> Marina, what is the official guideline?
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2011, at 09:59, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>>
>>> As I mentioned on the EJB 3.1 EG when we did asynchronous, I don't
>>> like that it is tied into the bean developer realm.
>>>
>>> I've opened up http://java.net/jira/browse/EJB_SPEC-11 as a proposed
>>> alternative.
>>> Looking forward to your comments.
>>>
>>> Carlo
>>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1388 / Virus Database: 1516/3735 - Release Date: 06/30/11
>
>