Hi Siva,
On 03/14/2013 01:33 PM, Sivakumar Thyagarajan wrote:
> The message inflow contracts would still be true for a RA delivering
> messages to a no-methods listener interface based MDB. It is just that
> the RAR is not limited to delivery to methods in the MLI but can make
> calls to the MDB message listener methods.
>
My point is just we should state the same requirements in the JCA spec
* Proxy implements all public business methods of the actual message
endpoint class
* Proxy implements the message listener interface
* Existing MessageEndpoint contract must be met
Depending on people reading the EJB and JMS specs to get the full
picture will just end bad.
Best regards,
Jesper