Hi Jesper
On Wednesday 23 January 2013 01:04 AM, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/22/2013 12:55 PM, Sivakumar Thyagarajan wrote:
>> Choice #3, I have been advised recently, would not work in the cases of
>> MDBs-packaged-in-a-WAR scenario, where we would have all MDBs that are
>> part of a WAR share the java:comp namespace. [2]
>>
>
> Their requirements for this should be discussed on the call, since this is
> news to us.
Ok, let us discuss this. There are no special requirements for
MDBs-in-WAR, though.
> The previous discussion of this subject there was an agreement to reject
> this issue.
We didn't reject MEF.getActivationName(). We had tried to find
alternatives that would work. It appears that choice #3 won't.
>> [2] Section 15.4.2 and in
>> http://java.net/projects/ejb-spec/downloads/download/ejb-3_2-core-prd.pdf
>
> "
> Extra caution should be used when configuring environment dependencies for
> such bean components.
> "
Sorry, is there anything in this that we should be concerned about?
Thanks
--Siva