users@connector-spec.java.net

[connector-spec-users] [jsr322-experts] Re: Singleton MDBs being discussed in the EJB EG (JSR-345)

From: Jun, Byung-Woo <byung-woo.jun_at_ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:39:48 +0000

Agreed - whatever the MDB container mechanism (either using annotation, or set it '1'). It is up to EJB specs and application server implementation. It is beyond the scope of JCA as Jesper said.

Thanks,
Byung-Woo Jun




-----Original Message-----
From: Jesper Pedersen [mailto:jesper.pedersen_at_redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 8:46 AM
To: jsr322-experts_at_connector-spec.java.net
Subject: [jsr322-experts] Re: Singleton MDBs being discussed in the EJB EG (JSR-345)

On 01/07/2013 05:32 AM, Sivakumar Thyagarajan wrote:
> Hi
>
> FYI. There is an ongoing discussion on Singleton MDBs in the EJB EG:
> http://java.net/projects/ejb-spec/lists/jsr345-experts/archive/2013-01
> /message/0
>
>
> The Connector spec doesn't have any requirement on the size of the MDB
> (MessageEndpoint) pool. So if the MDB container chooses to limit a
> MessageEndpoint to '1' for Singleton MDBs that should be fine as long
> as the MDB container follows the semantics of
> MessageEndpointFactory.createMessageEndpoint.
>
> What do you think?
>

Agreed, beyond the scope of JCA.

Best regards,
  Jesper