[jsr322-experts] Re: Singleton MDBs being discussed in the EJB EG (JSR-345)

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Wilson Tian <wilson.tian_at_oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:51:45 -0800 (PST)

+1

Thanks
Wilson

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jun, Byung-Woo [mailto:byung-woo.jun_at_ericsson.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 12:40 AM
> To: jsr322-experts_at_connector-spec.java.net
> Subject: [jsr322-experts] Re: Singleton MDBs being discussed in the EJB EG (JSR-345)
>
> Agreed - whatever the MDB container mechanism (either using annotation, or set it '1'). It is up to EJB specs
> and application server implementation. It is beyond the scope of JCA as Jesper said.
>
> Thanks,
> Byung-Woo Jun
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesper Pedersen [mailto:jesper.pedersen_at_redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 8:46 AM
> To: jsr322-experts_at_connector-spec.java.net
> Subject: [jsr322-experts] Re: Singleton MDBs being discussed in the EJB EG (JSR-345)
>
> On 01/07/2013 05:32 AM, Sivakumar Thyagarajan wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > FYI. There is an ongoing discussion on Singleton MDBs in the EJB EG:
> > http://java.net/projects/ejb-spec/lists/jsr345-experts/archive/2013-01
> > /message/0
> >
> >
> > The Connector spec doesn't have any requirement on the size of the MDB
> > (MessageEndpoint) pool. So if the MDB container chooses to limit a
> > MessageEndpoint to '1' for Singleton MDBs that should be fine as long
> > as the MDB container follows the semantics of
> > MessageEndpointFactory.createMessageEndpoint.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> Agreed, beyond the scope of JCA.
>
> Best regards,
> Jesper
>
>