In this case, the tasks should ignore the UserTransaction forbidden
access for CMT EJBs rule and require the task to manage transactions
when needed.
Regards
Anthony
On 1/28/14 8:24 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> Hi experts, my colleague requested a clarification on a point in the
> specification.
>
> Thanks in advance for your responses.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: CMT EJB Transaction Invocation Context Propagation
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:44:51 +0100
> From: Eduardo Martins <emartins_at_redhat.com>
> To: David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd_at_redhat.com>
>
> Hi David, what I would like to obtain from the JSR 236 expert group is
> a clarification wrt task submission by CMT EJBs, to the managed
> executors. Should the context service create and manage a new
> transaction for the task execution, if the task was submitted by a CMT
> EJB with an active transaction? Or should these tasks ignore the
> UserTransaction forbidden access for CMT EJBs rule, and require the
> task to manage transactions when needed?
>
> —E