Hi David,
The support for distributable executors in section 3.5 of the spec is
listed as optional. Do you prefer that we should remove the section
altogether?
Regards
Anthony
On 8/28/12 8:51 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> I can configure a singleton EJB which allows fully concurrent access.
> I can then use regular invocations to do basically the same thing as
> distributable executors - execute tasks on remote nodes, possibly with
> results.
>
> On 08/15/2012 04:10 PM, Anthony Lai wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Not sure I understand the overlap. Do you mind giving more details?
>>
>> Regards
>> Anthony
>>
>> On 8/4/12 3:18 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>>> I am concerned at the level of overlap between asynchronous EJB
>>> execution and distributable executors. It seems that distributable
>>> execution, especially with affinity, is largely the same as calling a
>>> singleton EJB configured with bean-managed concurrency.
>>>
>>> Are we sure that this has a place in the spec?
>>
>
>